Skip to main content

Frenchteacher.net subscriber survey

Every few months I do a quick survey using Surveymonkey to get feedback about how the site is being used by subscribers.

This is the link:

https://www.surveymonkey.co.uk/r/6T62PCL

I am keen to see which areas of the site are most used and what improvements or additions subscribers would like to see.

One of my main areas to focus on over the next few months will be resources for the new GCSE and A-level specifications, even though there plenty of resources already in place.

I have already produced GCSE role play and photo card resources and a set of literary texts with GCSE-style exercises. I shall be making sure that any topic and exercise type gaps are filled.

For A-level I have been focusing on making sure themes are well covered and will add further resources on summary writing and translation.

As far as users who live outside England and Wales are concerned, do let me know if there are any assessment-related resources which could be useful. A small but important proportion of subscribers do work in countries such as the USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland and Scotland, to name a few.

Despite being somewhat distracted by co-writing a book in recent months (!), I am committed to improving frenchteacher.net and to attracting as many subscribers as possible.

By the way, recent additions to the site are:

A text and exercises on poverty for intermediate/GCSE level.
That set of 10 literary extracts I mentioned for intermediate/GCSE level.
A video listening task on bullying in schools for low advanced/AS level.
A text with exercises about sugar for intermediate/GCSE level.
A text and exercises about key dates in the history of the EU - advanced level.
A video listening task on jihad for intermediate/GCSE level.
A text with exercises about online bullying - for advanced level.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g