Skip to main content

Implications of new accountability measures

I wonder whether we have all taken on board the possible implications of the DfE's new accountability measures due to come into force in 2016.

I quote from my ALL newsletter:

There is an additional new measure which will be the floor standard, and which will be published in league tables. This records the percentage of pupils receiving a ‘pass’ in English and mathematics, along with pupils’ average scores across a suite of eight qualifications consisting of English and mathematics; three further English Baccalaureate (EBacc) subjects; and three other high value qualifications: EBacc, other academic, arts or vocational. 

The original EBacc attainment measure remains unchanged as a soft accountability measure, and will be reported in performance tables. This consists of A*-C grades in each of: English, mathematics, two science subjects, history/geography, a foreign language. 

Now, there is no doubt that the EBacc accountability measure had a positive effect on the numbers taking a modern language GCSE examination this year (2013). There was a significant increase in linguists, though maybe not quite the game-changing figure some may have hoped for. Numbers rose back up to their level of 2010, no better than that. If the EBacc is now to become a measure of secondary importance, it is highly likely that MFL numbers will flatten or even fall away again. Minds will be focused on maths, English and the other six subjects - three of these must be Ebacc subjects, but not necessarily a language (i.e. sciences, history and geography).

It is also worth noting, in passing, that the Ofqual is reveiewing the status of some GCSE subjects, so it remains possible that pupils will not be able to count, for example, drama or PE as GCSEs.

We do not have enough young people studying languages at 16. Well under half of pupils take a language at GCSE. This figure should be higher if we are to give young people more opportunities and provide the linguists for the nation's needs.

I have always been of the opinion that, in the UK, a languages for all policy at 16 may not be the best solution. Teaching a foreign language is a hard sell and I am prepared to accept that some pupils may be better served doing something else.

However, there are plenty of potential linguists who are missing out on opportunities.

How we address this (given the political consensus about lack of compulsion at KS4) is another matter. To raise the status of MFL one possibility would be to encourage some universities to make a GCSE in MFL a minimum requirement for entry. This alone would have a dramatic effect on GCSE take-up.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,