Skip to main content

Parallel texts on frenchteacher

Many teachers and pupils have enjoyed using the parallel texts on frenchteacher. In case you don't know what they are, I'm talking about two texts, presented side by side, one in the target language, the other in English. Texts if this sort can be found on the Y7-10/11 pages of my site. I confess that I was never a huge fan of parallel texts when I taught. They went against my instinct and training which were to avoid using English as far as possible. Why would students bother to decipher or discover a new text if they can simply glance across at its English translation?

However, there are solid reasons for making use of parallel texts. Firstly, you can get pupils to read texts closer to their maturity level than many you find in text books. You can use more complex language than you might have done without a translation. This should make texts more interesting to students.

Secondly, showing the English translation leaves pupils in no doubt at all what the text means. Despite our best efforts at making target language transparent to students, many remain confused and welcome a clear translation. Some teachers believe that we should always make sure that all language is understood, that all input is comprehensible. Translation makes this possible. We should not, they argue, be so dogmatic about TL use that we sacrifice students' understanding.

That said, showing English does potentially discourage students from engaging carefully with the source text. There is value is forcing students to go through the process of decoding a text whose meaning is not at first apparent.

If you are a fan of the parallel text, there are plenty to choose from on frenchteacher.net. On the Y7 page you can print off a whole booklet of parallel texts featuring topics I thought might interest beginners: dolphins, spiders, meerkats, sharks, vampires, the Channel Tunnel, the Eiffel Tower and many more. On the Y8 page you'll find slightly longer texts on robots, the Tour de France, Cinderella and the game Minecraft.

The Y9 page has articles about migration to Europe, fair trade, a heroic charity walk and two 'faits divers', a man who falls from a balcony and a girl abandoned at a motorway service station. On the Y10-11 page you'll find zombies, Islamic State, Maglev trains, superheroes, phobias and more.

Along with each pair of texts there are exercises which force students to engage with the text in the TL: true/false, ticking correct sentences, completing vocab lists and so on. This means that you and the pupils can remain largely in the target language, while having the benefit of seeing the Menai g of the source text.

Finding interesting reading for younger students is always a challenge. Parallel texts are one way of providing material which might tickle their fancy.




- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

12 principles of second language teaching

This is a short, adapted extract from our book The Language Teacher Toolkit . "We could not possibly recommend a single overall method for second language teaching, but the growing body of research we now have points to certain provisional broad principles which might guide teachers. Canadian professors Patsy Lightbown and Nina Spada (2013), after reviewing a number of studies over the years to see whether it is better to just use meaning-based approaches or to include elements of explicit grammar teaching and practice, conclude: Classroom data from a number of studies offer support for the view that form-focused instruction and corrective feedback provided within the context of communicative and content-based programmes are more effective in promoting second language learning than programmes that are limited to a virtually exclusive emphasis on comprehension. As teachers Gianfranco and I would go along with that general view and would like to suggest our own set of g