Skip to main content

Classroom organisation and display

What would your ideal MFL classroom organisation and display be like?

Firstly, how about the spatial arrangement of the classroom?

There has been research into this. For example (MacAuley, 1990 - "Classroom Environment: a literature review").

"Seating children in rows facilitates on-task behaviour and academic learning; whereas more open arrangements, such as clusters, facilitate social exchanges among students."

No surprises there.

Having experimented over the years with tables facing the front, group tables and horse shoes, I believe tables facing the front works best. This arrangement discourages inappropriate talking and helps students focus on you. Tables can easily be moved for group work or just moved to the edge of the class if you need an open space. For smaller groups, for example A-level where class control is barely an issue, I would move the tables into a horse shoe pattern to facilitate discussion and good listening habits.

As far as display is concerned, David Didau in his Learning Spy blog has explored this in a little detail. He asks: "So, what is the point of classroom display? Most people would readily agree that it should support students’ learning. If it fails this uncontroversial test, should we tear it down?" Fair point. There has also been research which suggests that over-elaborate displays can distract young children.

At secondary level, I doubt very much whether research could help us much on this one. Here are my thoughts on it. I try to justify each in terms of student learning.

  • If you have enough room at the front have a large map of the main target language country. You can refer to it quite often when locating places or when teaching points of the compass or geographical features like mountains and rivers. It's also handy for those conversations with pupils who can tell you where they've been or when you want to explain where you are going on a school trip or exchange.
  • I would keep a large area for displaying student work which, ideally, would be refreshed every few weeks. Students can assist with this job at lunchtime. Younger students probably value their work being displayed more than older ones. The pay-off in terms of progress may be a little more motivation and the fact that children can (and do) read each others work. More comprehensible input. Every little helps!
  • If space allows have some simple classroom phrases displayed at the front. I am talking about the set phrases students may want to use, such as "May I go to the toilet?" Or "How do you say...?" These, although not linguistically very productive in terms of transferable language, do help create the target language environment you want. They send out a message.
  • If space allows I would display some posters of target language country places of interest. These have cultural, general knowledge value and may stimulate a student's interest and imagination.
  • I would generally avoid displays of verb tables etc. You can always have these as laminated mats on students' desks. I would also avoid displays of level descriptors unless it is the school's policy to have them displayed. I doubt whther such displays further student progress. You might even argue that displaying verb tables makes studenst too dependent on them.
  • I would have the clock at the back of the room. You can see it, but the students cannot clock watch.This should help concentration and set the right tone.
  • I would have some motivational message in the target language on the door. "On parle français ici" is fine. Again, this s to set the target language tone.
  • Why not seek out interesting from the foreign country? Food or drink containers are good. These have cultural value and can also be used to teach vocabulary and grammar.
As a final point, although teachers are very busy and may not get the time to refresh displays, they do set a tone. If they are tired or dog-eared they may, at the very margins, set the wrong tone for students entering the space.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,