Skip to main content

L'état des choses dans l'enseignement des langues vivantes

Ayant réfléchi à cette question, j'ai décidé d'écrire mes pensées sous forme d'essai (en anglais). Dans le cas peu probable que quelqu'un veuille le lire: le-voici:

http://www.frenchteacher.net/stateoftheart.doc

Comments

  1. This has made enlightening (if slightly worrying) reading for someone about to embark on their NQT year. I'm at the start of my language teaching career and have lots to learn, but it seems to me that what you say is spot on, particularly that ours is a utalitarian age. It seems to me that the current system of education is functional, mechanical and obsessed with achievement of targets - but achievement at the expense of an educational experience providing opportunity for enrichment, enjoyment and learning for the sake of learning. I accept that not all children will love the study of languages per se but it seems to me that today's learners are all TOO aware of targets, levels of attainment and focused all too young on the ultimate goal of 'getting a good job'. It seems to me that the pertinent questions are twofold: first, how to get the government to place higher value on the study of languages and second, how to attract children to languages at age 14 in the meantime - perhaps a detailed study of what motivates our current learners and an action plan based on this would help? My experiences are very limited and I'm trying to become as informed as I can about language-teaching and the current state of affairs so thanks for an interesting and incisive read!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the comment. I really hope you are not put off at all! But I do hope you find yourself in departments where the latest initiatives are kept in perspective and where the focus is on good lessons, hard work and enjoyment. Best of luck for your NQT year. Do get in touch via frenchteacher.net if you need any advice.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the natural order hypothesis?

The natural order hypothesis states that all learners acquire the grammatical structures of a language in roughly the same order. This applies to both first and second language acquisition. This order is not dependent on the ease with which a particular language feature can be taught; in English, some features, such as third-person "-s" ("he runs") are easy to teach in a classroom setting, but are not typically fully acquired until the later stages of language acquisition. The hypothesis was based on morpheme studies by Heidi Dulay and Marina Burt, which found that certain morphemes were predictably learned before others during the course of second language acquisition. The hypothesis was picked up by Stephen Krashen who incorporated it in his very well known input model of second language learning. Furthermore, according to the natural order hypothesis, the order of acquisition remains the same regardless of the teacher's explicit instruction; in other words,

What is skill acquisition theory?

For this post, I am drawing on a section from the excellent book by Rod Ellis and Natsuko Shintani called Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research (Routledge, 2014). Skill acquisition is one of several competing theories of how we learn new languages. It’s a theory based on the idea that skilled behaviour in any area can become routinised and even automatic under certain conditions through repeated pairing of stimuli and responses. When put like that, it looks a bit like the behaviourist view of stimulus-response learning which went out of fashion from the late 1950s. Skill acquisition draws on John Anderson’s ACT theory, which he called a cognitivist stimulus-response theory. ACT stands for Adaptive Control of Thought.  ACT theory distinguishes declarative knowledge (knowledge of facts and concepts, such as the fact that adjectives agree) from procedural knowledge (knowing how to do things in certain situations, such as understand and speak a language).

La retraite à 60 ans

Suite à mon post récent sur les acquis sociaux..... L'âge légal de la retraite est une chose. Je voudrais bien savoir à quel âge les gens prennent leur retraite en pratique - l'âge réel de la retraite, si vous voulez. J'ai entendu prétendre qu'il y a peu de différence à cet égard entre la France et le Royaume-Uni. Manifestation à Marseille en 2008 pour le maintien de la retraite à 60 ans © AFP/Michel Gangne Six Français sur dix sont d’accord avec le PS qui défend la retraite à 60 ans (BVA) Cécile Quéguiner Plus de la moitié des Français jugent que le gouvernement a " tort de vouloir aller vite dans la réforme " et estiment que le PS a " raison de défendre l’âge légal de départ en retraite à 60 ans ". Résultat d’un sondage BVA/Absoluce pour Les Échos et France Info , paru ce matin. Une majorité de Français (58%) estiment que la position du Parti socialiste , qui défend le maintien de l’âge légal de départ à la retraite à 60 ans,